方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 数字建构主义扎根理论× | 经典扎根理论× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1967 |
| 提出者≠ | Kathy Charmaz (CGT); applied to digital contexts by qualitative internet researchers | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative theory-building approach | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| 别名 | Digital CGT, online constructivist grounded theory, digital-context CGT, constructivist GT with digital data | Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GT |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Digital Constructivist Grounded Theory (Digital CGT) applies Kathy Charmaz's constructivist variant of grounded theory to data generated in digital environments — social media platforms, online communities, forums, digital interviews, and other internet-mediated spaces. It treats meaning as co-constructed between researcher and participant in digitally-mediated contexts, and generates theory grounded in how people make sense of experience through and within digital life. | Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|