方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 双重差分法 (Diff-in-Diff)× | 随机对照试验 (RCT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 计量经济学 | 实验设计 |
| 方法族≠ | Regression model | Hypothesis test |
| 起源年份≠ | 1994 | 1948 |
| 提出者≠ | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) | James Lind (early precursor, 1747); modern formulation: Austin Bradford Hill & Medical Research Council (1948) |
| 类型≠ | Causal inference / panel regression | Interventional comparative study |
| 开创性文献≠ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 | Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) | RCT, randomised controlled trial, clinical trial, Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma (RCT) Tasarımı |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 7 |
| 摘要≠ | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. | A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard experimental design in clinical and health research, in which participants are randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group so that the effect of an intervention can be measured with the highest possible degree of internal validity. The modern parallel-group RCT was formalized by Austin Bradford Hill and the Medical Research Council in their landmark streptomycin trial of 1948, and its reporting is governed today by the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (Schulz et al., 2010). |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|