ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

日记法×调查×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1920s–1940s (systematised by Allport, 1942)Late 19th century; systematic social-science use from 1940s
提出者Gordon Allport (systematic social-science use); Nels Anderson (early fieldwork diaries)Francis Galton, Charles Booth, and early social statisticians; formalised by Paul Lazarsfeld in the 1940s
类型Qualitative / mixed-methods data-collection techniqueQuantitative (primarily) or mixed-methods data-collection instrument
开创性文献Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761941415Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118456149
别名diary study, diary technique, self-report diary, daily diary methodquestionnaire survey, survey research, self-report survey, questionnaire study
相关56
摘要The diary method is a data-collection technique in which participants record their thoughts, behaviours, events, or experiences in their own words at regular or event-contingent intervals over a defined study period. By capturing data close in time to the event, diaries reduce retrospective recall bias and give researchers access to the texture of everyday life as it unfolds — something one-off surveys and retrospective interviews cannot provide.A survey is a systematic data-collection method in which a standardised set of questions is posed to a sample of respondents to measure attitudes, behaviours, demographics, or other constructs. Surveys can be administered via paper, telephone, online platforms, or face-to-face. They are among the most widely used instruments in social, behavioural, health, and educational research because they can reach large, geographically dispersed samples at relatively low cost.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Diary Method · Survey. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare