ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

DHF-EDAS×最佳-最差法 (Best-Worst Method)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20232015
提出者Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X.Rezaei, J.
类型Dual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
开创性文献Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. (2023). EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information and its application to suppliers selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy DOI ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要DHF-EDAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: DHF-EDAS · BWM. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare