方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于设计的实用主义混合方法× | 行动研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 研究设计 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1946 |
| 提出者≠ | Synthesised from Design-Based Research Collective (2003) and pragmatist mixed methods scholars (Creswell, Tashakkori, Teddlie) | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury |
| 类型≠ | Mixed methods research design | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506386706 | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | DBPMM, design-based mixed methods, pragmatic design-based research, educational design research with mixed methods | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry |
| 相关≠ | 2 | 1 |
| 摘要≠ | Design-based pragmatic mixed methods combines the iterative, intervention-focused logic of design-based research (DBR) with the philosophical pragmatism that underpins mixed methods inquiry. Researchers design, test, and refine an educational or organisational intervention across multiple cycles while simultaneously collecting quantitative outcome data and qualitative process data. The pragmatist worldview licenses the integration of both data strands in service of a practical research question: does this design work, for whom, and why? | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|