方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于设计的混合方法矩阵× | Design-Based Research× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 研究设计 | 田野方法 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003–2011 | 1992 |
| 提出者≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark; Jennifer C. Greene | Ann L. Brown and Allan Collins (independently, 1992) |
| 类型≠ | Mixed methods design classification framework | Interventionist qualitative-quantitative mixed methodology |
| 开创性文献≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 | Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | mixed methods design matrix, MM design typology matrix, mixed methods design framework, DBMM matrix | DBR, design research, design experiment, educational design research |
| 相关≠ | 1 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | The design-based mixed methods matrix is a systematic framework for selecting and structuring mixed methods research designs. It organises key design decisions — purpose, timing of data strands, point of integration, and weighting of quantitative versus qualitative components — into a coherent matrix that guides researchers toward a defensible, transparent design. The framework draws on the typology traditions of Creswell and Plano Clark and Greene's purposes-based approach. | Design-based research (DBR) is an iterative, interventionist methodology that simultaneously designs educational interventions and builds theory about how and why those interventions work in authentic, complex settings. Originating in Ann Brown's 1992 classroom experiments and Allan Collins's parallel work, DBR treats the learning environment as both the object of study and the site of theory generation, cycling through design, enactment, analysis, and redesign until both practical improvement and theoretical insight are achieved. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|