方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 牙釉质微磨损纹理分析× | 个体最小数量× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 考古学 | 考古学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1988 | 1953 |
| 提出者≠ | Peter Teaford | Theodore White |
| 类型≠ | Dietary inference method | Faunal quantification method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Ungar, P. S. (2007). Evolution of the human diet: The known, the unknown, and the unknowable. Oxford University Press. link ↗ | White, T. E. (1953). A method of calculating the dietary percentages of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity, 19(4), 396-398. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | microwear analysis, dental wear analysis | MNI method, minimum individual number |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA) is a method that reconstructs diet and dietary behavior from microscopic wear patterns on the surfaces of teeth. Pioneered by Mark Teaford in the 1980s, DMTA analyzes the three-dimensional texture of wear patterns produced as food is chewed. The method reflects short-term (last few months) dietary composition, complementing longer-term dietary information obtained from stable isotope analysis. DMTA has proven powerful for distinguishing diets rich in tough/fibrous foods from those dominated by hard/brittle foods. | Minimum number of individuals (MNI) is a quantitative zooarchaeological method that estimates the minimum number of animals represented in a faunal assemblage based on the frequency of unique skeletal elements. Developed by Theodore White in 1953, it is one of the most widely used techniques for analyzing animal bone assemblages from archaeological sites. The MNI method helps archaeologists understand hunting and butchering patterns, interpret subsistence practices, and assess the diversity of fauna exploited by past human populations. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|