方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 因果识别（使用do演算）× | 对隐藏偏差的敏感性分析（Rosenbaum 界 / E 值）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2009 | 2002 |
| 提出者≠ | Judea Pearl | Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value) |
| 类型≠ | Causal identification framework | Sensitivity analysis for causal inference |
| 开创性文献≠ | Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606 | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 |
| 别名≠ | do-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus) | Rosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivity |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths. | Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017). |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|