ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

因果识别(使用do演算)×回归断点设计 (Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20092008
提出者Judea PearlImbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
类型Causal identification frameworkQuasi-experimental causal design
开创性文献Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
别名do-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus)RDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
相关55
摘要DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths.Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: DAG Causal Identification · Regression Discontinuity. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare