ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于D-数(邓氏证据理论)的改进TOPSIS方法×最佳-最差法 (Best-Worst Method)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20162015
提出者Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y.Rezaei, J.
类型D-Number ranking — D:Ω→[0,1] with Σ_{B⊆Ω} D(B) ≤ 1; incomplete evidence allowed (Deng 2012)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
开创性文献Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. (2016). A Modified TOPSIS Method Based on D Numbers and Its Applications in Human Resources Selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering link ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要D-TOPSIS (Modified TOPSIS based on D-Numbers (Deng Evidence Theory)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: D-TOPSIS · BWM. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare