方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| CURB-65肺炎严重程度评分× | 序贯器官衰竭评估评分× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 临床评估 | 临床评估 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003 | 1996 |
| 提出者≠ | W. Staniford Lim, et al. | Jean-Louis Vincent and Rui Moreno |
| 类型≠ | Community-acquired pneumonia severity assessment | Organ dysfunction and sepsis assessment |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lim, W. S., van der Eerden, M. M., Laing, R., et al. (2003). Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax, 58(5), 377-382. DOI ↗ | Vincent, J. L., Moreno, R., Takala, J., et al. (1996). The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfuncti on/failure. Intensive Care Medicine, 22(7), 707-710. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | CURB-65, Pneumonia severity | SOFA, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment |
| 相关 | 3 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | CURB-65, derived and validated by Lim et al. in 2003, is a 5-point severity of illness score for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It assesses confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥65 years to stratify mortality risk and guide admission and treatment decisions. | The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, introduced by Vincent and Moreno in 1996, is a 24-point daily assessment tool that quantifies organ dysfunction across six physiological systems in critically ill patients. It was adopted into the 2016 Sepsis-3 definitions and is now the international standard for identifying and grading sepsis-related organ failure. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|