方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 文化谦逊量表× | 患者-提供者文化敏感性量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 跨文化护理 | 跨文化护理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1998 | 2008 |
| 提出者≠ | Tervalon, Murray-García; Hook et al. | Dogba, Foley |
| 类型 | Self-report | Self-report |
| 开创性文献≠ | Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117–125. DOI ↗ | Dogba, M. J., & Foley, R. (2008). Patient preferences for involvement in healthcare decision-making: A comparison of interprofessional joint decision-making and traditional medical approaches. Health Expectations, 11(1), 68–76. link ↗ |
| 别名 | CHS | PPCSS |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Cultural Humility Scale (CHS) is a self-report instrument designed to assess healthcare providers' capacity for cultural humility—a stance of openness, self-reflection, and power-sharing with patients from diverse cultural backgrounds. Originating from theoretical work by Tervalon and Murray-García (1998) and operationalized by Hook and colleagues (2013), the CHS measures clinicians' willingness to acknowledge limits in cultural knowledge, receptiveness to patient perspectives, and commitment to lifelong learning about culture. The instrument is widely used in medical, nursing, counseling, and other health professions education to evaluate trainees' readiness for culturally humble practice. | The Patient-Provider Cultural Sensitivity Scale (PPCSS) is a measure designed to assess the degree to which healthcare providers demonstrate cultural sensitivity and respect in clinical encounters. The instrument evaluates provider behaviors and attitudes that honor patients' cultural identities, values, and preferences, including active listening, non-judgmental communication, incorporation of cultural health beliefs into care planning, and shared decision-making. The PPCSS can be completed by both patients (rating provider behavior) and providers (self-rating), making it a valuable tool for evaluating patient-centered, culturally responsive care. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|