方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Cultural Domain Analysis× | Folk Taxonomy Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Anthropology | Anthropology |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1994 | 1979 |
| 提出者≠ | Stephen P. Borgatti (synthesis of cognitive anthropology methods) | Ethnoscience / cognitive anthropology (systematized by Spradley) |
| 类型≠ | Integrated framework for eliciting and analyzing cultural domains | Procedure for reconstructing hierarchical folk classifications |
| 开创性文献≠ | Borgatti, S. P. (1994). Cultural domain analysis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4(4), 261–278. link ↗ | Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 9780030444968 |
| 别名 | CDA, Domain Analysis (cognitive anthropology), Cultural Domains Approach, Cognitive Domain Analysis | Taxonomic Analysis, Folk Classification Analysis, Folk Taxonomies, Ethnotaxonomy |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Cultural domain analysis is the integrated framework in cognitive anthropology for discovering the content and structure of a cultural domain — a coherent set of related items such as illnesses, animals, kin terms, or emotions — as the members of a culture themselves organize it. It chains together elicitation methods (free listing, pile sorting, triad tests) and analytic methods (salience, multidimensional scaling, clustering, consensus analysis) to move from 'what items are in this domain?' to 'how are they organized and how widely is that organization shared?' | Folk taxonomy analysis — taxonomic analysis in Spradley's terms — reconstructs how a culture hierarchically classifies the items of a domain through the inclusion relationship 'is a kind of.' It takes the terms surfaced in domain analysis and arranges them into nested levels, revealing the folk classification system: which broad categories contain which narrower ones, and how deep the hierarchy goes. The result is the culture's own taxonomy, which may differ markedly from any scientific one. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|