方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Cultivation Differential Analysis× | Uses and Gratifications Survey× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Communication | Communication |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1976 | 1973 |
| 提出者≠ | George Gerbner & Larry Gross | Elihu Katz, Jay Blumler & Michael Gurevitch |
| 类型≠ | Survey-based comparison of heavy versus light television viewers | Audience-centered survey approach to media motivations and rewards |
| 开创性文献≠ | Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–199. DOI ↗ | Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Cultivation differential, Heavy-light viewer differential analysis, Mainstreaming and resonance analysis, Yetiştirme Farkı Analizi | U&G survey, Gratifications sought and obtained survey, Media gratifications measurement, Kullanımlar ve Doyumlar Anketi |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Cultivation differential analysis is the analytic core of cultivation theory: it compares the social-reality beliefs of heavy television viewers with those of light viewers to estimate how much exposure to television's recurrent messages 'cultivates' a worldview. The cultivation differential is the percentage-point gap between heavy and light viewers in endorsing a television-consistent belief, examined net of demographic controls and refined by the concepts of mainstreaming and resonance. | The uses and gratifications survey is the dominant audience-centered method in communication research, asking not what media do to people but what people do with media. Codified by Katz, Blumler, and Gurevitch in 1973, it treats audiences as active agents who select media to satisfy social and psychological needs, and it measures those motives and the rewards obtained through structured self-report scales. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|