ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Cubic-WASPAS×最佳-最差法 (Best-Worst Method)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20122015
提出者Jun, Y. B. Kim, C. S. Yang, K. O.Rezaei, J.
类型Cubic outranking/ranking — Cubic Fuzzy Set (CuFS: interval [a,b] for internal membership, scalar λ for external)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
开创性文献Jun, Y. B., Kim, C. S., Yang, K. O. (2012). Cubic sets. Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics link ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要CUBIC-WASPAS (Cubic-WASPAS — Cubic extension of WASPAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jun, Y. B. Kim, C. S. Yang, K. O. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CUBIC-WASPAS · BWM. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare