ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

立方-TOPSIS×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20181995
提出者Garg, H., Kaur, G.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Cubic Intuitionistic Fuzzy ranking — CIFN = (IVIFN, IFN): interval membership/non-membership ⟨[ζL,ζU],[ϑL,ϑU]⟩ (IVIFS part) + point membership/non-membership ⟨ζ,ϑ⟩ (IFS part); extended TOPSIS with weighted generalised distanceStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Garg, H., Kaur, G. (2018). Extended TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision-making problems under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Scientia Iranica E DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要CUBIC-TOPSIS (Cubic-TOPSIS — Cubic extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Garg, H., Kaur, G. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CUBIC-TOPSIS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare