ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Cubic-EDAS×标准差法 (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20232016
提出者Paul, T.K., Jana, C., Pal, M.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
类型Cubic Pythagorean Fuzzy ranking — CuPyFN = ⟨IvPyFN, PyFN⟩ = (⟨[Y⁻,Y⁺],[F⁻,F⁺]⟩,⟨Y,F⟩); Pythagorean constraint (Y⁺)²+(F⁺)² ≤ 1; average-solution EDAS with score-function PDA/NDARelative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
开创性文献Paul, T.K., Jana, C., Pal, M. (2023). Multi-criteria group decision-making method in disposal of municipal solid waste based on cubic Pythagorean fuzzy EDAS approach with incomplete weight information. Applied Soft Computing DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要CUBIC-EDAS (Cubic-EDAS — Cubic Pythagorean Fuzzy EDAS (CuP-EDAS)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Paul, T.K., Jana, C., Pal, M. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CUBIC-EDAS · CILOS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare