ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

交叉前后测实验设计×拉丁方设计与拉丁方-希腊方设计×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineHypothesis test
起源年份1963 (Campbell & Stanley framework); crossover methodology formalized 1980s–2000s1935
提出者Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley (pretest-posttest framework); Stephen Senn (crossover trial methodology)Ronald A. Fisher
类型Within-subjects experimental designParametric blocked ANOVA
开创性文献Senn, S. (2002). Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496533Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments (9th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1119492443
别名within-subjects pretest-posttest design, repeated-measures crossover design, AB/BA pretest-posttest design, crossover repeated-measures designLatin Square, Greco-Latin Square, Latin Kare ve Greco-Latin Kare Deseni
相关55
摘要A crossover pretest-posttest experimental design is a within-subjects experiment in which each participant receives two or more treatments in a randomized sequence, with outcome measurements taken both before and after each treatment period. By serving as their own control across conditions, participants allow direct intra-individual comparison, dramatically increasing statistical power while reducing the sample size required relative to a parallel-group design.The Latin square design is a blocked experimental design that simultaneously controls two independent nuisance factors — the row block and the column block — so that each treatment appears exactly once in every row and every column of an n×n arrangement. Formalised by Ronald A. Fisher in his 1935 monograph The Design of Experiments, the design dramatically reduces experimental error by absorbing variation from two extraneous sources before the treatment effects are estimated.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Crossover Pretest-Posttest Experimental Design · Latin Square Design. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare