ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

交叉自然实验×交叉现场实验×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Crossover designs: mid-20th century; applied to natural experiments: 1990s–2000s1960s–1970s (field experiment framework); crossover application in non-clinical fields from 1980s onward
提出者Drawn from crossover trial methods (Jones & Kenward) and natural experiment tradition (Mill, 1843; Dunning, 2012)Crossover design principles attributed to R. A. Fisher (1930s); field experiment tradition developed by Donald T. Campbell and Julian Stanley (1960s)
类型Quasi-experimental designWithin-subject experimental design conducted in naturalistic settings
开创性文献Dunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1107698000Senn, S. (2002). Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471496533
别名within-unit natural experiment, reversal natural experiment, crossover quasi-experimentwithin-subject field experiment, crossover field trial, repeated-measures field experiment, field crossover design
相关55
摘要A crossover natural experiment exploits an externally imposed condition — a policy change, law, or environmental event — that exposes the same units (individuals, regions, firms) to both treatment and control states at different times. By observing each unit in multiple conditions, researchers use within-unit variation to estimate causal effects without researcher-controlled randomization, combining the internal validity advantage of crossover designs with the real-world relevance of natural experiments.A crossover field experiment is a within-subject experimental design conducted outside the laboratory in naturalistic, real-world settings. Each participant or unit receives multiple treatments in a randomized sequence, separated by washout periods, allowing researchers to observe causal effects while each unit serves as its own control. This approach combines the internal validity of crossover designs with the ecological validity characteristic of field experimentation.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Crossover Natural Experiment · Crossover Field Experiment. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare