ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

交叉多基线设计×单被试实验设计×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1968 (multiple baseline origins); crossover extension developed in behavioral and rehabilitation research from the 1980s onward1960s (Sidman 1960; formal applied codification by Kazdin and Baer in 1970s–1980s)
提出者Derived from Baer, Wolf, and Risley (multiple baseline, 1968) and classical crossover design traditionsMurray Sidman (foundational tactics); B. F. Skinner (applied behavior analysis lineage)
类型Single-case experimental design with crossover sequencingExperimental research design
开创性文献Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. DOI ↗Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195030440
别名CMBD, crossover MBD, multiple baseline crossover design, within-subject multiple baseline designSSED, single-case experimental design, n-of-1 design, intrasubject replication design
相关66
摘要The crossover multiple baseline design is a single-case experimental design (SCED) that layers crossover sequencing onto a multiple baseline structure. Across two or more tiers — participants, behaviors, or settings — baselines are staggered in time; then treatments are introduced and later reversed or alternated across tiers, so each tier acts as both a treatment and a control unit. The design provides within-subject replication while controlling for time-related confounds.Single-subject experimental design (SSED) establishes experimental control by repeatedly measuring one individual (or a small number of individuals) across baseline and intervention phases, using the participant as their own control. Instead of comparing groups, it compares the participant's own behavior across conditions over time. Widely used in applied behavior analysis, special education, rehabilitation, and clinical psychology, SSED allows causal inference from small or unique samples where group designs are impractical.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Crossover Multiple Baseline Design · Single-Subject Experimental Design. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare