ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

横断面调查研究×关系调查×
领域研究设计研究设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1930s–1950s (formalized with large-scale opinion and health surveys)Mid-20th century onward (systematised ~1960s–1990s)
提出者Established through the social survey tradition (Bowley, Gallup, and others in the early-to-mid 20th century)Established in educational and social science research methodology; systematised by Fraenkel & Wallen and others
类型Quantitative non-experimental designQuantitative non-experimental survey design
开创性文献Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey Research Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412958929Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0073525748
别名cross-sectional survey, single-occasion survey, prevalence survey design, snapshot surveycorrelational survey, associational survey, relationship survey design, relational descriptive survey
相关44
摘要Cross-sectional survey research administers a structured questionnaire or interview to a representative sample of a population at one point in time. It is the workhorse design for estimating prevalence, describing group characteristics, and mapping associations among variables across a wide range of disciplines — from public health and education to marketing and political science.Relational survey research is a quantitative, non-experimental design that gathers structured self-report data from a sample and examines the statistical associations among two or more variables. Unlike purely descriptive surveys, which only characterise distributions, relational surveys ask whether and how strongly variables co-vary — providing evidence of relationships without manipulating conditions or establishing causation.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Cross-sectional survey research · Relational Survey. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare