ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

批判性主题分析×Braun & Clarke 的反思性主题分析法×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010s (consolidation as named variant)2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
提出者Draws on Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis, 2006) combined with critical theory traditions (Frankfurt School, feminist and postcolonial theorists)Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
类型Qualitative analysis approachQualitative research method
开创性文献Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名CTA, critical-theoretic thematic analysis, thematic analysis with critical lens, critical qualitative thematic inquiryRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
相关56
摘要Critical thematic analysis (CTA) is a qualitative approach that combines the systematic coding procedures of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis with the interrogative stance of critical theory. Rather than merely describing patterns in data, CTA asks whose interests those patterns serve, what power relations they reflect, and what is absent or silenced. It is used to surface ideology, structural inequality, and hegemonic assumptions embedded in participants' accounts or in texts.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Critical Thematic Analysis · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare