方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 批判性斯特劳斯扎根理论× | 批判性建构主义扎根理论× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s (Straussian GT); critical synthesis from 2000s onward | 2000s–2010s (post-Charmaz 2006) |
| 提出者≠ | Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian base); critical integration draws on critical theory traditions (e.g., Kincheloe, Denzin) | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist GT base); synthesis with critical theory by various scholars (e.g., Belfrage, Hauf; Street; Wuest) |
| 类型 | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932500 | Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029164 |
| 别名≠ | critical GT (Straussian), critical Strauss-Corbin grounded theory, critical systematic grounded theory | Critical CGT, Critical constructivist GT, Emancipatory constructivist grounded theory, Critical Charmaz grounded theory |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Critical Straussian Grounded Theory combines the systematic coding procedures of Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory — open, axial, and selective coding leading to a paradigm model — with a critical theoretical stance that foregrounds power, inequality, and social structure. The researcher does not merely describe a social process but interrogates the conditions that produce and sustain it, connecting emergent theory to broader structures of domination or marginalization. | Critical constructivist grounded theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory with an explicit critical theoretical lens — typically feminist, critical race, or Freireian frameworks — to generate theory that not only explains a social process but also interrogates power relations, structural inequalities, and ideological forces that shape participants' experiences. The result is grounded theory with an emancipatory intent. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|