方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 批判性隐喻分析× | 批判性话语分析 (CDA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2004 | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) |
| 提出者≠ | Jonathan Charteris-Black | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative-critical textual analysis | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1403932921 | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | CMA, critical metaphor research, corpus-based critical metaphor analysis, ideological metaphor analysis | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) is a qualitative method for uncovering how metaphorical language constructs, legitimises, or contests power relations and ideological positions in texts. Developed by Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004), it integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory with the evaluative concerns of Critical Discourse Analysis to reveal the persuasive and ideological work performed by metaphors in political, institutional, and media discourse. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|