ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

批判性民族志×话语分析×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Late 20th century (~1980s–1993 systematisation)1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
提出者Jim Thomas (systematised); rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory (Adorno, Horkheimer) and feminist/postcolonial traditionsNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
类型Qualitative research methodMethod
开创性文献Thomas, J. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography. Sage Publications. link ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
别名critical ethnographic research, critical qualitative ethnography, advocacy ethnography, emancipatory ethnographyDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
相关62
摘要Critical ethnography is a qualitative research approach that combines sustained fieldwork immersion with explicit critical theory to examine how power, inequality, and ideology shape the lived experiences of marginalised communities. Unlike conventional ethnography, which aims to describe a culture as it is, critical ethnography commits the researcher to questioning what is taken for granted and to producing knowledge that can serve as a resource for social change. Rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory and expanded through feminist, postcolonial, and race-critical traditions, it treats the research process itself as a political act.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Critical Ethnography · Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare