ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

批判性民族志×行动研究×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Late 20th century (~1980s–1993 systematisation)1946
提出者Jim Thomas (systematised); rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory (Adorno, Horkheimer) and feminist/postcolonial traditionsKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury
类型Qualitative research methodMethod
开创性文献Thomas, J. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography. Sage Publications. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗
别名critical ethnographic research, critical qualitative ethnography, advocacy ethnography, emancipatory ethnographyParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry
相关61
摘要Critical ethnography is a qualitative research approach that combines sustained fieldwork immersion with explicit critical theory to examine how power, inequality, and ideology shape the lived experiences of marginalised communities. Unlike conventional ethnography, which aims to describe a culture as it is, critical ethnography commits the researcher to questioning what is taken for granted and to producing knowledge that can serve as a resource for social change. Rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory and expanded through feminist, postcolonial, and race-critical traditions, it treats the research process itself as a political act.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Critical Ethnography · Action Research. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare