ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

批判性文献分析×批判性话语分析 (CDA)×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Late 20th – early 21st century (2000s–present as an explicit variant)Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提出者Glenn Bowen; Lindsay Prior (foundational document analysis); critical theory tradition (Freire, Habermas)Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
类型Qualitative research design and analytic methodQualitative research method
开创性文献Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
别名CDA-doc, critical documentary analysis, critical policy document analysis, critical textual document analysisCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
相关56
摘要Critical document analysis is a qualitative method that systematically examines written, visual, or digital documents — such as policy texts, institutional reports, curriculum materials, and official records — through a critical theoretical lens. Rather than treating documents as neutral containers of information, it interrogates how documents produce, reflect, and reproduce power relations, ideologies, and social inequalities. The approach draws on critical theory traditions, including the work of Paulo Freire and Jurgen Habermas, as well as established frameworks for document analysis developed by Bowen and Prior.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Critical Document Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare