方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 批判性话语分析 (CDA)× | 叙事分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) |
| 提出者≠ | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research method | Qualitative interpretive method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ |
| 别名 | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|