ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

批判性话语分析 (CDA)×扎根理论×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)1967
提出者Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth WodakBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
类型Qualitative research methodMethod
开创性文献Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
别名CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational AnalysisGT, Grounded Theory Approach
相关63
摘要Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Critical Discourse Analysis · Grounded Theory. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare