方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 批判性话语分析 (CDA)× | 定性内容分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) | 1980 |
| 提出者≠ | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak | Klaus Krippendorff; refined by Margrit Schreier |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ | Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis | Content Analysis, Categorical Content Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. | Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) is a systematic, inductive method for analyzing textual or visual data by identifying and categorizing meaning units into content categories. Developed and formalized by Klaus Krippendorff (1980), QCA can be purely qualitative (inductive, exploratory) or combined with quantitative counting; it analyzes manifest content (explicit, surface meanings) and latent content (underlying, interpretive meanings). |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|