ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

批判性数字民族志×数字民族志×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010sLate 1990s – 2000s
提出者Synthesised from critical ethnography (Thomas, 1993) and digital/virtual ethnography (Hine, 2000); scholars including Bhatt, de Roock, and Saldanha developed explicit critical-digital frameworks from the 2010s onwardChristine Hine (virtual ethnography); Robert V. Kozinets (netnography)
类型Qualitative research designQualitative research method
开创性文献Bhatt, I., & de Roock, R. (2013). Capturing the sociomateriality of digital literacy events. Research in Learning Technology, 21. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21624 DOI ↗Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage. ISBN: 978-1847875228
别名CDE, critical online ethnography, critical virtual ethnography, digital critical ethnographyonline ethnography, virtual ethnography, internet ethnography, netnography
相关56
摘要Critical digital ethnography is a qualitative research design that combines the immersive, participatory observation of digital ethnography with the power-conscious, emancipatory orientation of critical theory. Researchers embed themselves in online communities, platforms, or digital practices and examine not only what people do online but also how digital spaces reproduce, challenge, or transform structures of power, inequality, and identity. It is widely used in education, communication studies, and social science.Digital ethnography is a qualitative research method that adapts traditional ethnographic fieldwork to online and digitally mediated settings. Drawing on sustained participant observation, document collection, and sometimes interviews, the researcher immerses themselves in one or more digital communities — social media platforms, forums, gaming spaces, or messaging groups — to understand how culture, identity, and social practice are constructed through digital interaction. The approach recognises that online spaces are not merely reflections of offline life but distinctive sites of cultural production in their own right.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Critical Digital Ethnography · Digital Ethnography. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare