ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

批判性数字民族志×批判性话语分析 (CDA)×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010sLate 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提出者Synthesised from critical ethnography (Thomas, 1993) and digital/virtual ethnography (Hine, 2000); scholars including Bhatt, de Roock, and Saldanha developed explicit critical-digital frameworks from the 2010s onwardNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
类型Qualitative research designQualitative research method
开创性文献Bhatt, I., & de Roock, R. (2013). Capturing the sociomateriality of digital literacy events. Research in Learning Technology, 21. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21624 DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
别名CDE, critical online ethnography, critical virtual ethnography, digital critical ethnographyCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
相关56
摘要Critical digital ethnography is a qualitative research design that combines the immersive, participatory observation of digital ethnography with the power-conscious, emancipatory orientation of critical theory. Researchers embed themselves in online communities, platforms, or digital practices and examine not only what people do online but also how digital spaces reproduce, challenge, or transform structures of power, inequality, and identity. It is widely used in education, communication studies, and social science.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Critical Digital Ethnography · Critical Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare