ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

批判性建构主义扎根理论×建构主义扎根理论×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010s (post-Charmaz 2006)2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
提出者Kathy Charmaz (constructivist GT base); synthesis with critical theory by various scholars (e.g., Belfrage, Hauf; Street; Wuest)Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
类型Qualitative research designQualitative research method
开创性文献Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029164Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
别名Critical CGT, Critical constructivist GT, Emancipatory constructivist grounded theory, Critical Charmaz grounded theoryCGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
相关56
摘要Critical constructivist grounded theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory with an explicit critical theoretical lens — typically feminist, critical race, or Freireian frameworks — to generate theory that not only explains a social process but also interrogates power relations, structural inequalities, and ideological forces that shape participants' experiences. The result is grounded theory with an emancipatory intent.Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Critical constructivist grounded theory · Constructivist Grounded Theory. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare