方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 关键案例研究× | 解释性案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–2006 (formalized) | 1978–1995 (Stake's foundational works) |
| 提出者≠ | Bent Flyvbjerg (formalized); Robert K. Yin (case study typology) | Robert E. Stake; extended by Bent Flyvbjerg |
| 类型 | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. DOI ↗ | Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957671 |
| 别名 | critical case, strategic case study, critical-instance case study, paradigmatic case study | intrinsic case study, constructivist case study, qualitative case study, naturalistic case study |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A critical case study is a case study design in which the researcher deliberately selects a case that is strategically important for testing, confirming, challenging, or extending an existing proposition, theory, or policy claim. Rather than choosing a typical or representative case, the researcher argues that if the finding holds here — in this most-likely, least-likely, or paradigmatic instance — it can reasonably be expected to hold more broadly. This purposive logic transforms a single case into a powerful analytical tool. | Interpretive case study is a qualitative research design in which the researcher selects a bounded real-world case — a person, program, event, organization, or community — and seeks to understand it from the inside, through the meanings participants themselves construct. Unlike explanatory or descriptive case study, the interpretive variant foregrounds the researcher's active role in making sense of complex, context-laden data rather than testing hypotheses or cataloguing facts. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|