ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

批判性判例法分析×法律内容分析×
领域田野方法田野方法
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Late 1970s–1980s (CLS conference 1977; Unger 1983)1940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts)
提出者Critical Legal Studies (CLS) movement; key figures include Duncan Kennedy, Roberto Unger, Mark TushnetInterdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward
类型Qualitative legal research approachSystematic qualitative-quantitative text analysis
开创性文献Unger, R. M. (1983). The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Harvard Law Review, 96(3), 561–675. link ↗Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761915454
别名critical legal analysis, CLS case analysis, critical judicial analysis, critical legal readingLCA, legal text analysis, jurimetric content analysis, statutory content analysis
相关66
摘要Critical case law analysis applies the theoretical tools of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) to the examination of judicial decisions. Rather than accepting legal reasoning at face value, this approach interrogates how courts construct legal arguments, whose interests those arguments serve, and how ideological commitments are concealed beneath the appearance of neutral doctrinal logic. It exposes the political and social dimensions embedded in judicial language and outcomes.Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social-science methods, enabling researchers to draw reproducible, evidence-based conclusions about how law is written, applied, or has changed over time.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Critical Case Law Analysis · Legal Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare