ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

CRITIC-M×基于标准移除效应的方法×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19952021
提出者Based on Diakoulaki et al.'s CRITIC; modified variants developed laterKeshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z.
类型Objective weight derivation via correlation and varianceRemoval-effect objective weighting (logarithmic utility)
开创性文献Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. DOI ↗Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z. (2021). Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Informatica DOI ↗
别名CRITIC-M, Modified CRITIC
相关38
摘要CRITIC-M (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified) is an objective weight derivation method that extends the classical CRITIC approach. It assigns weights to criteria based on two intrinsic properties of the decision matrix: variance (how much a criterion differentiates alternatives) and correlation (how much a criterion conflicts with or supplements others). Modified variants adjust the formulation to improve robustness or interpretability.MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CRITIC-M · MEREC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare