ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于理想解距离的方案优劣排序×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20211995
提出者Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Distance from ideal and anti-ideal (geometric mean compromise)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D. (2021). Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods. Environment, Development and Sustainability DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要CRADIS (Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CRADIS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare