ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于理想解距离的方案优劣排序×CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20212025
提出者Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
类型Distance from ideal and anti-ideal (geometric mean compromise)Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
开创性文献Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D. (2021). Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods. Environment, Development and Sustainability DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要CRADIS (Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CRADIS · CIMAS. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare