方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 成本-效益分析 (CEA)× | 失能调整生命年 (DALY)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 卫生经济学 | 卫生经济学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1984 | 1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Drummond & Stoddart (Health Economics Research Group, McMaster University) | Christopher J. L. Murray and Alan D. Lopez (World Health Organization / World Bank) |
| 类型 | Method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (Eds.). (1996). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press. link ↗ | Murray, C. J., Lopez, A. D., & Jamison, D. T. (1994). The Global Burden of Disease in 1990: Summary Results, Sensitivity Analysis, and Future Directions. In C. J. Murray & A. D. Lopez (Eds.), Global Burden of Disease and Injury. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | CEA, ICER, Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio | DALY, global disease burden metric, burden of disease |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Cost-effectiveness analysis compares the incremental cost per unit of health benefit gained by one intervention relative to a comparator (standard care or best alternative). Developed rigorously in the 1980s by Drummond, Stoddart, and colleagues, CEA is now the standard framework for technology appraisal globally. NICE, HAS, CADTH, and other health technology assessment bodies use CEA to decide which treatments warrant public funding and at what price. | A DALY quantifies disease burden as the sum of years of life lost to premature death and years lived with disability. Developed by the World Health Organization and World Bank in 1990 as part of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, DALYs enable epidemiologists and public health planners to compare disease burden across populations, identify health priorities, and evaluate intervention impact. One DALY = one lost year of 'healthy' life; DALYs averted measure progress toward health goals. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|