ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Cosponsorship Network Analysis×Manifesto Coding×
领域Political SciencePolitical Science
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20062001
提出者James H. FowlerManifesto Research Group / Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR)
类型Social-network analysis of legislative collaborationQuantitative content analysis of party manifestos
开创性文献Fowler, J. H. (2006). Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks. Political Analysis, 14(4), 456–487. DOI ↗Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199244003
别名Cosponsorship networks, Legislative collaboration networks, Bill cosponsorship analysis, Co-sponsorship network analysisCMP coding, MARPOR coding, Manifesto content analysis, Party manifesto coding
相关34
摘要Cosponsorship network analysis treats legislative collaboration as a social network: when legislators cosponsor one another's bills, they form ties, and the resulting web of connections can be measured with the tools of network science. Introduced to congressional studies by James Fowler in 2006, it turns the public record of who signed on to whose bills into a graph among lawmakers, revealing who is central and influential, how connected the chamber is, and which clusters of legislators form coalitions. With inferential network models such as ERGMs, researchers move from describing the network to explaining why ties form.Manifesto coding is the quantitative content-analysis methodology of the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR) for measuring parties' policy preferences from their election manifestos. Trained coders break each manifesto into quasi-sentences and assign every unit to one of a fixed set of policy categories. Counting how often each category appears yields salience measures, and combining pro- and anti- categories produces position scores such as the left–right RILE index, giving comparable estimates of party positions across more than fifty democracies since 1945.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Cosponsorship Network Analysis · Manifesto Coding. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare