ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

COSMIN:评估测量工具研究的方法学质量×GRADE证据评估:评估证据确定性和推荐强度×
领域研究方法论研究方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20102008
提出者Mokkink et al. (COSMIN Group)Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group)
类型Measurement instrument evaluationResearch team / Guideline panel assessment
开创性文献Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. DOI ↗Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗
别名COSMINGRADE, GRADE approach
相关44
摘要COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is a systematic framework and 10-item checklist developed by Mokkink et al. (2010) to evaluate the methodological quality of studies that assess the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), questionnaires, and clinical scales. COSMIN guides the development, validation, and selection of health measurement instruments across clinical research and practice.GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: COSMIN Checklist · GRADE Evidence Profiling. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare