方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| COSMIN：评估测量工具研究的方法学质量× | CASP 随机对照试验清单× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究方法论 | 研究方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2010 | 1993 (updated through 2023) |
| 提出者≠ | Mokkink et al. (COSMIN Group) | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) |
| 类型≠ | Measurement instrument evaluation | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| 开创性文献≠ | Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. DOI ↗ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | COSMIN | CASP-RCT, CASP |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is a systematic framework and 10-item checklist developed by Mokkink et al. (2010) to evaluate the methodological quality of studies that assess the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), questionnaires, and clinical scales. COSMIN guides the development, validation, and selection of health measurement instruments across clinical research and practice. | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|