ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

复杂比例评估×多属性边界近似区域比较×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19962015
提出者Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G.
类型Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Border approximation area (distance from BAA)
开创性文献Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: COPRAS · MABAC. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare