ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

复杂比例评估×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19961995
提出者Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: COPRAS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare