ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

复杂比例评估×标准差与相关系数客观赋权法×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19962010
提出者Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
类型Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
开创性文献Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: COPRAS · CCSD. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare