ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

复杂比例评估×层次分析法×最佳-最差法 (Best-Worst Method)×
领域决策决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份199619802015
提出者Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.
类型Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
开创性文献Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
别名
相关888
摘要COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: COPRAS · AHP · BWM. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare