ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Controversy Mapping×Social Construction of Technology×
领域Science Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20101984
提出者Bruno Latour (Sciences Po médialab); codified by Tommaso VenturiniTrevor Pinch & Wiebe Bijker
类型Qualitative descriptive method and pedagogyConstructivist theory of technological development
开创性文献Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI ↗Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗
别名Cartography of controversies, Mapping scientific controversies, Controversy analysisSCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysis
相关44
摘要Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Controversy Mapping · Social Construction of Technology. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare