ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

控制偏好量表×CollaboRATE 共同决策量表×
领域以患者为中心的护理以患者为中心的护理
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19972013
提出者Lois DegnerGlyn Elwyn
类型Patient-reportedPatient-reported
开创性文献Degner, L. F., Sloan, J. A., & Venkatesh, P. (1997). The Control Preferences Scale. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 29(3), 21-43. link ↗Elwyn, G., Barr, P. J., Grande, S. W., Thompson, R., Walsh, T., & Ozanne, E. M. (2013). Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(1), 102-107. DOI ↗
别名Desired Role in Decision Making, Decision Role PreferenceCollaborative Therapeutic Engagement Scale
相关44
摘要The Control Preferences Scale (CPS) is a five-item measure that assesses a patient's preferred role in healthcare decision making, ranging from a passive (physician-directed) to active (patient-directed) or shared approach. Developed by Lois Degner and colleagues in 1997, the CPS measures the degree of control patients wish to exercise in treatment decisions: whether they prefer to leave decisions to the clinician, collaborate with the clinician, or make the final decision themselves. The scale is widely used to understand patient preferences for decision-making involvement and to evaluate the alignment between preferred and actual roles.CollaboRATE is a three-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess shared decision making (SDM) quality in clinical consultations. Developed by Glyn Elwyn and colleagues in 2013, it measures the degree to which clinicians involve patients in decisions about their care through simple, actionable items that are easy to administer and interpret. The scale has become a standard benchmark for evaluating SDM implementation in healthcare systems.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Control Preferences Scale · CollaboRATE. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare