ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

内容效度×量表开发×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份19751991–1995
提出者C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementMultiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson
类型Validity evidence / expert judgement procedureMulti-step methodological framework
开创性文献Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569
别名content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationquestionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building
相关65
摘要Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Content Validity · Scale development. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare