方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 内容效度× | 聚合效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1975 | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型≠ | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|